Minutes of the Council Meeting held on Wednesday 23rd July 2025 in Lindsey Village Hall, Church Road, Lindsey which commenced at 7.30pm.

In attendance
Cllrs. C Arthey (in Chair), R Corcoran, M Hainsworth, B Howe, J Moore and A Sturgeon and Mrs V Waples, Parish Clerk.

1. Opening and Welcome

The Chair, Cllr. Arthey, opened the meeting and thanked all for attending. The statement on reporting at meetings of the parish council was read by the Clerk. The Chair opened the meeting and thanked all for attending.

2. Apologies of Absence

  1. To receive apologies of absence – apologies of absence were received from Cllr. R Howe. Council consented to approve the apology as given, aif.
  2. Apologies of absence were noted from County Cllr. Finch and District Cllr. Jamieson.

3. Declaration of Members Interest

  1. To receive declarations of registrable, other and non-registerable interests as detailed in Appendix B of the LGA Model Code of Conduct Model Code of Conduct 2020 – Councillor Arthey declared a pecuniary interest for Planning Application 8i (DC/25/02699) and an other registrable interest under Finances 10ii regarding the Village Hall annual donation. There were no other declarations of interests.
  2. There were no declarations of gifts of hospitality received exceeding £50.
  3. There were no requests for dispensations for the agenda under discussion.

4. Minutes of Previous Meetings

To approve the minutes of the following Council Meeting:

  1. 14th May 2025 – Annual Council Meeting - the meeting agreed that the circulated minutes were a true and accurate record of the meeting that took place, and agreement was forthcoming for the Chair to sign the minutes, which he undertook in accordance with prevailing legislation, aif.

5. Public Forum

(maximum 10 minutes)

  1. To receive a report from County Councillor James Finch – Cllr. Finch’s written report was taken as read: a copy of the written report submitted can be seen at Appendix A. There were no questions / issues raised by Councillors for onward submission.
  2. To receive a report from District Councillor Leigh Jamieson – Cllr. Jamieson was invited to submit his report in which he commented or drew the meeting’s attention to the following: a copy of the written report submitted can be seen at Appendix B. There were no questions / issues raised by Councillors for onward submission.
  3. To receive comments from the public on the agenda as published – the clerk confirmed that no matters had been raised by the public.

6. Parish Matters

  1. Climate Awareness / climate emergency –
    • to receive an update / information on climate related issue coming forth – at this stage there was nothing to report but further updates would be forthcoming at later meetings – Cllr. Sturgeon reported that whilst it was a watching brief for the moment, villages the size of Lindsey have a huge potential for generating their own electricity for local use. The current Government has established that it is supportive of the premise of small scale locally generated systems being developable. Once the time was right, all agreed that the parish council should seek to be at the forefront of a Community Energy Project to be generated locally for use by businesses and residents in a defined area.
  2. To receive a progress report on matters relating to:
    • Traffic calming and appropriate signage on the A1141 in the vicinity of Canada Cottages and Hollow Trees Farm Shop – it was agreed that the Clerk would chase County Cllr. Finch for an update on this.
    • Traffic calming on C720 between Church Road to Lindsey Tye – the Clerk confirmed that she would chase County Cllr. Finch as the area still needing to be assessed prior to the consideration of the deployment of vehicle activated signs. Cllr. Finch would be asked once again to confirm whether the Community Highways Engineer has been to site to assess whether there were other traffic calming measures that could be introduced in this area.

7. Statutory Matters

None at time of serving.

8. Planning Matters

  1. To consider the following planning applications:
    • DC/25/02699. Proposal: Planning Application. Erection of two-storey and single-storey extensions and alterations. Change of use of part of agricultural land to residential curtilage. Location: Seagers Cottage, Kersey Road. Cllr. Arthey left the room whilst this matter was discussed and voted upon. All were in agreement that the cottage should be seen as a non-designated asset of heritage importance and should be retained as opposed to demolish. The proposal sought to retain this heritage asset and to develop around the cottage itself. Consideration was given as to whether the proposal was in keeping with the existing cottage. No evidence that anything has been amended internally in the existing cottage. Externally materials do not compliment the original cottage and the internal layout does not flow. All agreed that fundamental work would be required for the existing cottage to make it habitable. Original cottage structure being retained with the extension proposed to match the buildings in the vicinity was of importance to the meeting. Overall it was an interesting design but was the support in saving / restoring the original cottage compatible with the design of the extension. It was acknowledged that the cottage required work to be serviceable and habitable. Discussion followed and all were reminded of the most relevant policies for this application: LP03 high standard of design and does not enhance the character of the existing house. LP19 must conserve and enhance listed assets (unfit for dwelling). It was noted that the proposal is regarded by the designers as being sustainable as they are preserving the original dwelling. Further comments made commended that the proposal would keep the integrity of the original dwelling even though it might need to be gutted to ensure that it was fit for habitable purposes. Support for the proposed extension by some councillors was on the basis that it should enable the overall to be habitable and that composition of the buildings was not unrepresented of what is there already. The following proposal was put to the council and carried by a majority vote: “We commend the planning application on the basis that we wish to see the retention of Seagers Cottage, however discussion amongst councillors as to the specifics of the design was held as all were not in agreement with this decision. On the basis of the proposal, the majority, having voted in favour of supporting the application with commentary, would request that the following concerns are addressed prior to determination: External appearance: concerns raised over the external appearance. The cottage, as a non-designated heritage asset, should be acted upon sympathetically. Preference is for treatment of the exterior extensions to be more represented of the outbuildings within the curtilage of Seagers Cottage – boarded as opposed to brick. Internal layout: The layout of the original building was of concern, and reference was made to the statement in the Design and Access Statement which states that it is no longer fit for use and has fallen into disrepair. Overall the proposal fails to demonstrate how this will be addressed – concerns arise over ceiling heights, lack of heating and appropriate ventilation. Drainage: impact of the current ditch and potential run-off onto the site; generally drainage of the site”.
  2. To note the following planning applications determined by the local planning authority: there were none pending at the time of the summons being served.
  3. Council to consider further the development of a neighbourhood plan for either Lindsey or to consider the merits of creating a plan with neighbouring parishes following withdrawal of financial support from the government (Paper entitled Withdrawal of Government funding for Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) Preparation) – all understand that there was a desire to have influence over the future growth in Lindsey over the next twenty years. It was noted that a NDP can lead to opportunities to protect and enhance nature and the local environment e.g. BNG, protection of views, green infrastructure, climate change, flooding and renewable energy as well as design, infrastructure and housing. Whilst all agreed that a NDP might be beneficial for Lindsey, at this stage further insight into the overall funding and the path of the joint local plan as well as unitary discussions was required prior to commitment. It was however noted that it might be beneficial for the council to undertake some basic research into what was important to the community in terms of being preserved or enhanced.
  4. Council to consider verbal commentary in light of the above from the Clerk in relation to the processes to be followed during the production of a Neighbourhood Plan for Lindsey including indicative costs and funding streams – all noted the letter from Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council with regards to withdrawal of government funding for Neighbourhood Development Plan Preparation. It was recognised that costs could vary depending on the nature of the area, complexity of the plan, and the expertise that exists within the group preparing that neighbourhood plan. The average costs were estimated by the Government (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC)) at £10,000 to £86,000 per plan. Previously a neighbourhood plan group could apply for up to £10,000 in basic grant funding from Locality (government funding) with the District Council applying for the grant to cover the statutory consultations, strategic assessments, examination and referendum costs. As all such funding had been withdrawn, it was agreed that the council would pause and await the outcome of further stages of the Joint Local Plan to come forward prior to committing to undertake a neighbourhood development plan for Linsey.

9. Correspondence: To Consider / Note the Following

  1. SCC - Residents' Survey - Local Government Reorganisation – council were reminded that the survey is open until 4th August 2025.
  2. SALC – SALC AGM and 75th Anniversary 1st July 2025 – council received notes and recording of the meeting.
  3. BMSDC - Local Government Reorganisation update – council noted the latest communication on this matter.
  4. BMSDC - District-wide Community Governance Review 2025 – council noted commentary on this matter and the anticipated timescales for the submission requirements.
  5. BMSDC – Town and Parish Updates – council confirmed all monthly updates are emailed to Councillors for their perusal.
  6. SALC – to note all weekly news bulletins are emailed to Councillors for their perusal. Councillors to contact the Clerk if there are any items of interest / training courses they wish to attend. SALC – The Local Councillor – May 2025 – to note that the link to the online magazine has been circulated to all. Councillors to contact the Clerk if there are any items of interest / training courses they wish to attend.

10. Financial Matters

  1. To consider schedule of receipts received and payments made since the last meeting – Paper A – all confirmed receipt of Paper A (details can be seen at Appendix D) noting that no receipts had gone through the account since the last meeting. Payments that had been made covered the direct debit to HMRC for 4th quarter of PAYE due.
  2. To consider and approve the verified items awaiting authorization as per the schedule submitted – Paper B - all confirmed receipt of Paper B (details can be seen at Appendix D) - having reviewed the paper submitted, all approved the payments awaiting authorisation for settlement via online transfer, aif.
  3. To consider the Council's financial position to date – Paper C – Council noted the reconciled position of £11,410.15 once the accounts awaiting payment had been settled, aif. Councillors Corcoran and Hainsworth confirmed that they had verified the position against the bank statements and cashbook. (Details can be found at Appendix D).
  4. To consider the council budget versus actual statement to end of July 2025 – Paper D – all reviewed the submitted paper noted that at this stage there was little variance in the actual to budget for the period.
  5. Public rights and publication of Annual Governance and Accountability Return – exempt authority – all noted the expiry of the period of public rights for the inspection of the accounts for the year ending 31st March 2025. It was confirmed that there had been no requests for information submitted during the defined period.
  6. To consider the merits of changing the council’s banking provider from Barclays – given the inability of Barclays to address the basic requirement of adding a verified signatory onto the online banking system and its general failure to respond to matters in a timely manner, the Clerk sought permission to progress a change of bankers. In accordance with Financial Regulation 6.1 “The council's banking arrangements, including the bank mandate, shall be made by the RFO and authorised by the council; banking arrangements shall not be delegated to a committee. The council has resolved to bank with Barclays bank. The arrangements shall be reviewed bi-annually for security and efficiency”, the council agreed to the clerk’s recommendation that council’s bankers be changed to Unity Trust Bank plc (No. 204570 in the Financial Services Register). It was agreed that the full authorised signatories would remain as the Clerk and Councillors Corcoran and Hainsworth and council would request the implementation of a complex mandate with two authorised to sign any financial transactions.

11. Clerk’s Report

  1. To receive an update on the improvements to the two triangles near the Rose Pub – all noted that work had commenced and that the setts were reclaimed from the old Ipswich tram station. Compliments were passed on the work carried to date with the anticipation that the work would be finished the following day. All agreed that this was a positive use of CIL funding for the betterment of the community.
  2. To discuss further remedial works to the village sign – it was noted from the previous meeting that Councillors Arthey and Sturgeon were still to carry out an inspection to ascertain the state of the frame. All agreed that there were two options open to the council: renovate the original or commission a new sign picking up the themes. It was queried whether the first option was viable. Councillors Sturgeon, Arthey and Howe agreed to undertake an assessment on the current state for further discussion.

12. Parish Councillors’ Reports

  1. Friends of Lindsey Church – Talk by Polly Toynbee scheduled for 17th September 2025 at White Rose House – time to be confirmed.
  2. Elm Cottage – long term empty – what level of council tax is being levied?
  3. Churchyard – works have been completed through the intervention of Councillor Moore and thanks were offered for his assistance with this matter.
  4. Friends of St Peters are keen to install some stone setts along the path up to the church as soon as funding becomes available.

13. Date of Next Meeting

All meetings will take place in the Village Hall, Church Road, Lindsey.

  1. To note the next meeting has been rescheduled to 10th September 2025 – all noted the revised date.

14. Close of Meeting

There being no other business the Chairman declared the meeting closed 21.08pm.

Appendix A – Report from County Councillor James Finch

  • £8m funding for Bus Service improvements - The funding from the Department of Transport’s Local Authority Bus Grant can be used to create new bus services or enhance existing routes. Following on from previous grants from the Department for Transport to improve bus services, totalling £3.7m of revenue funding between 2023 and 2025, the new grant which has been allocated for 2025/26 comprises of: £2,805,076 revenue for delivering new or enhanced services. £5,229,805 capital for new and improved bus stops, bus stations, bus priority measures or vehicle upgrades. This money will enable Suffolk County Council to invest up to £5 million in capital projects to increase bus priority on congested streets, make improvements to bus stops and gain a better understanding of the journeys people are taking, paving the way for more innovative fare offers in the future. The council also plans to upgrade the current Real Time Passenger Information system, giving live updates on when buses will arrive at stops across the county. The remaining £2.8 million will be spent supporting the existing services on the county’s bus network and working with bus companies to finalise a number of route improvements and new services, set to launch later this year. The previous funding has created and enhanced more than 15 routes across the county, through the council’s Bus Service Improvement Programme (BSIP). These included the first Sunday and evening service between Sudbury and Bury St Edmunds for more than 20 years and direct links from Haverhill and Mildenhall to the West Suffolk Hospital.
  • Council cites numerous concerns as it formally objects to north Suffolk solar farm plans - The 250-megawatt solar farm and battery energy storage system will be spread out over 1,500 acres at multiple sites in the parishes of Occold, Eye, Brome and Oakley, Stuston, Thrandeston, Mellis, Burgate, Thornham Parva, Gislingham and Yaxley. The report outlines many concerns, including: Numerous parcels of Grade 2 agricultural land to be lost, Significant impacts on multiple communities, sensitive habitats and landscapes, eg Mellis Common, Numerous sites of high archaeological sensitivity, Cable corridors causing irreversible damage. “Frankly, there are serious questions about whether [this scheme] should ever have seen the light of day.” Furthermore, the county council strongly recommends that EcoPower publishes an interim design report by the end of June 2025. This would provide refined plans in light of further assessment work to be conducted, and the responses to this non-statutory consultation. This would go some way to providing reassurance and clarity regarding the proposals to the local community. It will also allow all concerned to review more details, in timely fashion, ahead of the statutory consultation expected later this year.
  • 200 new specialist SEND places for Suffolk costing £18.6 million The creation of 200 new specialist places across the county for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is set to be considered by Suffolk County Council’s cabinet. An extra 100 places could open this year for this year’s autumn term, and another 100 new places by September 2026, with further plans being drawn up. These places will be spread across Suffolk and tailored to meet need and demand with the objective of keeping pupils within the county and closer to home. The plan presented to cabinet on 1st April outlines how £18.6million could best be spent to support the growing population of SEND children and young people who need specialist education. Over the last five years, Suffolk pupils accessing special schools and units attached to mainstream schools has increased by over 40%. The proposal includes £3million to be spent on small groups and units in mainstream schools from September 2025 and £12million to be spent on developing satellite units linked to existing special schools across Suffolk from September 2026. The remaining £3.6million is earmarked for further SEND provision. In the past five years, 1,025 new specialist SEND places across Suffolk have been agreed.
  • Dementia Marketplace 25th June 2025 - Care Development East, in partnership with Suffolk County Council and the Suffolk and North East Essex Integrated Care Board (SNEE ICB), hosted the third annual Dementia Marketplace—a free, one-day event offering practical advice, support, and information for anyone affected by dementia. Held from 10:00am to 3:30pm at Trinity Park Conference & Events Centre, Ipswich. Dementia is the UK’s biggest health and social care challenge—and it’s growing. One in three people born in the UK today will develop dementia in their lifetime. By 2040, 1.4 million people are expected to be living with the condition. Early diagnosis is key—it unlocks treatment, support, and care that can make a real difference.
  • New Strategy Launched to Tackle Violence Against Women and Girls in Suffolk While Suffolk remains a safe county in which to live, work, and visit, the reality is that Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence continue to affect too many people. These crimes are often driven by harmful attitudes and gender-based stereotypes that disproportionately impact women and girls. However, the strategy recognises that anyone, regardless of gender identity, can be a victim and that support must be inclusive and far-reaching. The new Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Strategy places the experiences of victims and survivors at its heart. Shaped through extensive engagement with victim-survivors, support services, and frontline professionals, the strategy sets a clear and ambitious vision: For everyone in Suffolk to play their part in preventing and identifying Violence Against Women and Girls, creating the safety we all deserve. To achieve this vision, the strategy is built around four key ambitions: Stop the abuse before it starts, Support every survivor, Hold abusers accountable, Build a united front. In March 2025, the Suffolk Safer and Stronger Communities Board formally endorsed the strategy, marking an important milestone in the county's coordinated response to Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence.
  • Set Sail on a Journey Through Suffolk’s Maritime Past with Suffolk Archives Running from 27 June to 27 September at The Hold in Ipswich, the exhibition explores Suffolk’s deep connections to the sea from smuggling and sea rescues to shipbuilding, coastal communities, and historic ports. This free exhibition features fascinating contributions from local museums and organisations including the Felixstowe and Offshore Radio Group, Ipswich School, East Anglian Traditional Arts Centre, Lowestoft Maritime Museum, and the RNLI Archives. It is supported by Associated British Ports. To accompany the exhibition, Suffolk Archives has launched a packed programme of talks, walks, workshops, and family events offering something for curious minds of all ages. Young explorers can dive into storytelling adventures with The Yarnsmith of Norwich, Grethe Jensen, and Hannah Brailsford, who will bring to life tales of sea monsters, pirates, treasure and more.
  • Virtual Fostering and Adoption Sessions for the Stour Valley Fostering is a flexible role with options for short term care from a weekend a month to longer term opportunities, all providing life-changing support for local children. If you want to find out more about what it's like to foster or adopt with us, please call a member of the team on 01473 264800

Appendix B – Report from District Councillor Leigh Jamieson

  • Neighbourhood Plan funding - Last month’s announcement that all funding and support for the development of neighbourhood plans would cease immediately came as a shock to the council. The announcement came from the government following the spending review. While the ending of support was a possibility it was assumed that if it happened, it would be a staggered withdrawal. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Babergh District Council voted unanimously at the recent Council meeting to write to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner – Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and James Cartlidge. The letter is to state their concerns over Government plans to modernise planning committees as part of their current Planning and Infrastructure Bill. Proposals within the bill include a national scheme of delegation for planning decisions, designed to reduce the role of planning committees by restricting the type and numbers of applications heard by committees in future. This is to remove perceived obstacles to development and housebuilding, increasing the number of decisions made by officers rather than committees – despite only a fraction of planning applications being heard by committee.
  • Social Housing improvements - The councils housing team have turned the tide for tenants, transforming the service they provide and promising further improvements, with the launch of their new ‘repairs pledges.’ The teams have worked tirelessly to address the issues which led the councils having to self-refer to the Social Housing Regulator in 2023. Now, tenant satisfaction is on the rise, with a corresponding drop in complaints, currently putting Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils above last year’s average performance figures for local authority landlords nationwide. The councils have carried out a comprehensive review and transformation of its building services: restructuring its repairs and maintenance service, asset, and compliance service, and reviewing its processes, policies and how they engage with tenants, including the introduction of a new Complaint Task Force and resident liaison officers. Having been satisfied by the changes made and embedded in the service, the Regulator lifted the Regulatory Notice that had been imposed on the councils.
  • Leadership Change at Council - Back in 2023 when the coalition administration was put together, we agreed that the leadership of the council would be rotated. At the recent AGM Independent Councillor John Ward took up the reign for the coming year. As well as on housing, over the last two years the council has worked closely with communities to address new government housebuilding requirements, established a new nature reserve at Sproughton, worked to improve the energy efficiency of listed buildings, and have looked to simplify funding for community groups. However, ensuring the financial stability of the council remains a top priority.
  • Funding Pot For improving businesses - The Rural Business Growth Fund has been set up to offer capital grants of up to £10,000 to projects which focus on sustainability, diversification and improving the local tourism and visitor economy. In order to receive a grant, projects must meet one of the following priorities: Investment in net zero infrastructure, Investment and diversification at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Farm diversification outside of agriculture, Visitor economy business expansion. The total value of the fund stands at £178,922 available for businesses in Babergh. Grants of up to £15,000 can also be agreed for projects which strongly support the net zero infrastructure or farm diversification priorities. The fund intervention funding rate will be 50% of the total project costs up to the maximum grant amount which means the project must be match funded at 50%. Payments are made at the end of the process, so the project will need to be fully funded before any reimbursements are made. Full details of the fund can be found at the Heart Of Suffolk Website
  • Tree For Life - Once again, the councils ‘tree for life’ scheme is open to parents who have welcomed, or are due to welcome, a child into their families this year. The initiative, which runs every year, gives parents the opportunity to mark their child’s arrival by planting a fruit tree, which can them grow alongside them. There is also the chance for families, who have sadly lost a child to apply for a memory tree as part of the scheme. Since its inception, the councils have given out well over two thousand trees.
  • Local Government Survey - Suffolk’s five district and borough councils are launching a county-wide survey, open until 25th July, asking people for their views on the future of vital local government services. This will allow residents, businesses, and community groups to have their say on what they want to see from Local Government. The survey is available here - Project: Have Your Say on the Future of Local Government.
  • Summer Community Events - This year, Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils are again partnering with Abbeycroft to deliver free Community Fun Days at four locations across the districts. Families that attend one of the events can look forward to a wide range of activities, from bouncy castles and axe throwing to arts and crafts, and dancing. There will be numerous information stalls from local organisations and charities, providing access to valuable resources, support, and information.
  • Tour Of Britain - It has been announced that the second stage of the race will travel through Babergh and Mid Suffolk for the third consecutive year. The stage will start and finish in Stowmarket, travelling through both districts on route. This follows the first stage which takes place in East Suffolk. Having two stages in the county is a first for Suffolk.

Appendix C – Briefing Notes from Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils

  • Last chance to complete our LGR survey Our Local Government Reorganisation runs until 26 July. We are keen for as many people as possible to have their say, so please continue to share it with your networks and communities.
  • Thousands of listed building owners could benefit from innovative planning change Thousands of listed building owners could find it easier to make windows more energy efficient under innovative proposals from Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils.
  • New council chair elected, with outgoing chair appointed to cabinet role Cllr Elisabeth Malvisi has been elected as chair of Babergh District Council – resuming the role she has carried out for most of the last two years.
  • Council will share in celebrations for artist John Constable's 250th birthday anniversary In 2026, Babergh District Council will be supporting a national celebration marking the 250th anniversary of the birth of iconic Suffolk-born artist John Constable (1776-1837).
  • Rentable electric cars arrive in Babergh and Mid Suffolk Six electric vehicles have arrived at three locations across Babergh and Mid Suffolk for communities to use as part of the Plug In Suffolk Car Club.
  • £38k boost for community facilities in Babergh Improvements to village halls and community hubs are amongst the latest projects to receive a funding boost from Babergh District Council.
  • Councillors unite to defend democracy in local planning Cross-party councillors have unanimously condemned Government criticism of local planning authorities and attempts to “rob them” of their democratic powers.
  • ‘Trek, treat, repeat’ – Beautiful walks and foodie gems celebrated in new project Stunning walks and fantastic places to eat are showcased across Babergh and Mid Suffolk in a new initiative.
  • Public Switched Telephone Network Landline phones are switching to digital, which could stop telecare alarms working. This means that all landline providers need to know which of their customers use telecare, so they can keep them safe. The switchover is already happening, so you need to act now. If you, a resident, or someone you know uses a telecare alarm, make sure to contact the landline provider for support. Visit the digital phone switchover website for more information.
  • Community Fun Days July 2025 Community Fun Days are returning to the districts at the end of July, providing families with a series of free days out packed full of activities. Each event is free attend and has activities for all ages - people just need to turn up on the day. However, children that receive means tested free school meals are able to pre-book some activities and order a free lunch by visiting the Abbeycroft website - our partners for this year's fun days.
  • Rural Housing Week event Parishes across the districts are being invited to a Rural Housing Week event, hosted by Community Action Suffolk, from 10am to 3pm on 10 July at the John Peel Centre.

Appendix D – Financial Report

Items received since the last meeting:

Income Description Nett VAT Gross Ref
Total Income £NIL

Items Paid out since the last meeting:

Income Description Nett VAT Gross Ref
17.07.25 ICO – Data Protection Fee 47.00 0.00 47.00 DD
Total Expenditure £NIL

Items Authorized for Payment:

Expenditure Description Nett VAT Gross Ref
Clerk Clerk’s Salary & Expenses 492.24 0.00 492.24 BACS
Lindsey Village Hall Donation 200.00 0.00 200.00 BACS
St Peter’s Church Donation 400.00 0.00 400.00 BACS
Total Expenditure £1,092.24

Financial Report

Date £
Opening Balance 08.05.25 12549.39
Add Income Received May to July 0.00
Less Expenditure Incurred May to July 47.00
Less Verified Expenditure 23.07.25 1092.24
Closing Balance 23.07.25 11410.15

Bank Reconciliation

Community Account Statement at 19.07.25 12502.39
Less uncleared payments 1092.24
Plus unaccredited income 0.00
Reconciled Total As at 23.07.25 11410.15

Within the balance above are the following reserves:

  • (Restricted) CIL reserve - £7,185.18
  • Earmarked Stone setts - £1,500.00
  • Earmarked General reserve - £1,331.75
  • Election reserve - £836.59
  • General Fund - £556.63

Updates to this page

Published